I-TASSER results for job id S34340
|
|
|
Predicted Secondary Structure
|
| Sequence | AIVQTLVNSV |
| Prediction | CHHHHHHCCC |
| Conf.Score | 9789872149 |
|
|
Top 5 Models predicted by I-TASSER
|
|
|
Top 10 templates used by I-TASSER
|
| Rank | PDB Hit | Iden1 | Iden2 | Cov. | Norm. Z-score | Download Align. | | |
| Sec.Str Seq | CHHHHHHCCC AIVQTLVNSV | | 1 | 1qd6\ | 0.11 | | 0.90 | 1.64 | Download | | SIIANMLQE- |
| 2 | 1qd6. | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.90 | 1.86 | Download | | SIIANMLQE- |
| 3 | 1qd6\ | 0.11 | | 0.90 | 1.60 | Download | | SIIANMLQE- |
| 4 | 2bapD | 0.10 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1.54 | Download | | SLLEALQSGA |
| 5 | 1t1kA | 0.30 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 1.45 | Download | | GIVEQCCTSI |
| 6 | 2bapD | 0.10 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1.39 | Download | | SLLEALQSGA |
| 7 | 1qz7B | 0.30 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 1.43 | Download | | SILDEHVQRV |
| 8 | 1novD | 0.20 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 1.43 | Download | | SILKSGLNFA |
| 9 | 1qz7B | 0.30 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 1.33 | Download | | SILDEHVQRV |
| 10 | 1j5pA | 0.40 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 1.41 | Download | | SILRTLRNLE |
| (a) | All the residues are colored in black; however, those residues in template which are identical to the residue in the query sequence are highlighted in color. Coloring scheme is based on the property of amino acids, where polar are brightly coloured while non-polar residues are colored in dark shade. (more about the colors used) |
| (b) | Rank of templates represents the top ten threading templates used by I-TASSER. |
| (c) | Ident1 is the percentage sequence identity of the templates in the threading aligned region with the query sequence. |
| (d) | Ident2 is the percentage sequence identity of the whole template chains with query sequence. |
| (e) | Cov. represents the coverage of the threading alignment and is equal to the number of aligned residues divided by the length of query protein. |
| (f) | Norm. Z-score is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. Alignment with a Normalized Z-score >1 mean a good alignment and vice versa. |
| (g) | Download Align. provides the 3D structure of the aligned regions of the threading templates. |
| (h) | The top 10 alignments reported above (in order of their ranking) are from the following threading programs: |
| |
1: SP3 2: PPA-I 3: SPARKS 4: SP3 5: PPA-I 6: SPARKS 7: SP3 8: PPA-I 9: SPARKS 10: SP3 |
|
|
|
10 proteins in PDB which are structurally closest to the first I-TASSER model (identified by TM-align)
|
| Rank | TM-score | RMSDa | IDENa | Cov. | PDB Hit |
| 1 | 0.9846 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1jipA Model1 |
| |
| 2 | 0.9841 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2jmhA Model1 |
| |
| 3 | 0.9836 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 2fckA Model1 |
| |
| 4 | 0.9806 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1nrjB Model1 |
| |
| 5 | 0.9781 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 1jb9A Model1 |
| |
| 6 | 0.9778 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2fmyA Model1 |
| |
| 7 | 0.9771 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1di2A Model1 |
| |
| 8 | 0.9771 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1ni9A Model1 |
| |
| 9 | 0.9760 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1jhgA Model1 |
| |
| 10 | 0.9757 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 3e8oA Model1 |
| |
|
Structural alignment using TM-align |
TTVPDLESDSFHVDWYRTYAELRETAPVTPVRFLGQDAWLVTGYDEAKAALSDLRLSSDPKKKYPGVEVEFPAYLGFPEDVRNYFATNMGTSDPPTHTRLRKLVSQEFTVRRVEAMRPRVEQITAELLDEVGDSGVVDIVDRFAHPLPIKVICELLGVDEKYRGEFGRWSSEILVMDPERAEQRGQAAREVVNFILDLVERRRTEPGDDLLSALIRVQDDDDGRLSADELTSIALVLLLAGFESSVSLIGIGTYLLLTHPDQLALVRRDPSALPNAVEEILRYIAPPETTTRFAAEEVEIGGVAIPQYSTVLVANGAANRDPKQFPDPHRFDVTRDTRGHLSFGQGIHFCMGRPLAKLEGEVALRALFGRFPALSLGIDADDVVWRRSLLLRGIDHLPVRLDG -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------AIVQTLVNSV----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
QEHKPKKDDFRNEFDHLLIEQANHAIEKGEHQLLYLQHQLDELNENKSKELQEKIIRELDVVCAMIEGAQGALERELKRTDLNILERFNYEEAQTLSKILLKDLKETEQKVKDIQTQ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------AIVQTLVNSV-----
| | |
TPDFQIVTQRLQLRLITADEAEELVQCIRQSQTLHQWVDWFSQQEAEQFIQATRLNWVKAEAYGFGVFERQTQTLVGVAINEFYHTFNASLGYWIGDRYQRQGYGKEALTALILFCFERLELTRLEIVCDPENVPSQALALRCGANREQLAPNRFLYAGEPKAGIVFSLIP --------------------------------------------AIVQTLVNSV---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
SYQPSIIIAGPQNSGKTSLLTLLTTDSVRPTVVSQEPLSAADYDGSGVTLVDFPGHVKLRYKLSDYLKTRAKFVKGLIFMVDSTVDPKKLTTTAEFLVDILSITESSCENGIDILIACNKSELFTARPPSKIKDALESEIQKVIERRKKSLNELDVLGFKFANLEASVVAFEGSINKRKISQWREWIDEKL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------AIVQTLVNSV----------------------------------------
| | |
DPNATHIMIATGTGVAPFRGYLRRMFMEDVPNYRFGGLAWLFLGVANSDSLLYDEEFTSYLKQYPDNFRYDKALSREQKGKMYVQDKIEEYSDEIFKLLDGGAHIYFCGLKGMMPGIQDTLKKVAERRGESWDQKLAQLKKNKQWHVEVY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------AIVQTLVNSV--------------------------
| | |
FKDARLRLAEFLVQAAMDTGLKVPQGIKLELGLNTEEIALMLGTTRQTVSVLLNDFKKMGILERVNQRTLLLKDLQKLKEFSS ----AIVQTLVNSV---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
MPVGSLQELAVQKGWRLPEYTVAQESGPPHKREFTITCRVETFVETGSGTSKQVAKRVAAEKLLTKFKT ------------------------------------------------------AIVQTLVNSV-----
| | |
GCFLNAPDMYMEKLIVGPGAKGTIDLNLPLADNLRNVAAALGKPLSELTVTILAKHDAVIAEMQQLGVRVFAIPDGDVAASILTCMPDSEVDVLYGIGGAPEGVVSAAVIRALDGDMNGRLLAGIEAGKVLRLGDMAR -------------------------------AIVQTLVNSV-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
SAAMAEQRHQEWLRFVDLLKNAYQNDLHLPLLNLMLTPDEREALGTRVRIIEELLRGEMSQRELKNELGAGIATITRGSNSLKAAPVELRQWLEEVLLKSD ----AIVQTLVNSV---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
TVISHGTLSASAEHAAHLRQLLVHIAQATRQEDGCLLYLVSEDLSQPGHFLITEHWDNLGAHTHLALPGVTQAIDALKHLNVTDLKITAYEAGEAINIG ------------------AIVQTLVNSV-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | |
| (a) | Residue pairs that are structurally aligned by TM-align program are highlighted in color. Coloring scheme is based on the property of amino acids, where polar are brightly coloured while non-polar residues are colored in dark shade.(more about the colors used) |
| (b) | Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between Model1 and the PDB structures in our template library. |
| (c) | RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align. |
| (d) | IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region. |
| (e) | Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the model. |
|
| (a) | Ranking is based on EC-score, which is a confidence score for the Enzyme Classification (EC) Number prediction. |
| (b) | RMSDa is the RMSD between models and the PDB structure in the structurally aligned regions by TM-align. |
| (c) | IDENa is percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region. |
| (d) | Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of model. |
| (e) | EC-Score is defined based on the C-score of the structure prediction and similarity of the model with known enzyme structures, as identified using both global and local structural alignment programs. The global similarity score uses TM-score, IDENa,RMSDa and Cov. of the structural alignment by TM-align, while the local match compares the structural and chemical similarity of local spatial motifs in the model with known catalytic site of enzymes. A prediction with a EC-score >1.1 signifies a prediction with high confidence (upto 3 digit numbers of EC) and vice versa (For details, see Ambrish, Kucukural and Zhang,Large scale benchmarking of protein function prediction using predicted protein structures, 2009, submitted). |
|
| Consensus Prediction of Gene Ontology terms | | |
|
| (a) | Ranking in the first table is based on a function prediction score (Fh-score), which is calculated based on the C-score of the structure prediction and the TM-score, IDENa, RMSDa and Cov. of the structural alignment by TM-align between the predicted model and the PDB structures (For details, see Ambrish, Kucukural and Zhang,Large scale benchmarking of protein function prediction using predicted protein structures, 2009, submitted). |
| (b) | RMSDa is the RMSD between models and the PDB structure in the structurally aligned regions by TM-align. |
| (c) | IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region. |
| (d) | Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of model. |
| (e) | A consensus prediction of GO terms is derived from the structural analogs that have an Fh-score of >=1.0. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on the Fh-score of the template from which the GO term is derived. A prediction with a GO-score >0.5 signifies a prediction with high confidence and vice versa. |
|
| No binding site residues were found in the predicted structure. |
|
|
|
| | Please cite following articles when you use the I-TASSER server: |
| 1. | Yang Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9:40 (2008). |
| 2. | Yang Zhang. Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins, 8: 108-117 (2007). |
| 3. | Sitao Wu, Jeffrey Skolnick, Yang Zhang. Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biology, 5:17 (2007). |
|